“Storage of Grafts Outside of the Body”
A discussion and examination of follicular hair graft storage during hair transplant procedures.
Original Publication: ISHRS, Hair Transplant Forum International. Volume 28/ Number 3/ May -Jun 2018. Page 102
Author: Robin Unger, MD– New York, NY email@example.com
This article focused in on two main areas:
1.Temperature of hair transplant graft holding solutions.
2.The various holding solutions themselves.
The Main Question:
Dr. Unger asks a simple but important question: what temperature is best for storing grafts that were just surgically removed from the donor area ? She correctly points out that most hair transplant doctors “will assume that colder temperatures (ideally 4-5 degrees Celsius) are preferred for grafts while outside the body”.
But she then goes on to surmise that this way of thinking is “because that is what has been taught for quite a long time at meetings”. She is no doubt correct and goes on to challenge this blind orthodoxy by stating “However, this is not necessarily true.” Thereby opening the door to a deeper analysis of holding solutions in general, their optimal application, and their optimal temperatures.
She begins by offering what is doubtless the most popular theory as to why hair transplant doctors, or any organ transplant doctor, would store living cells in cold temperature solutions in the first place:
“The main reason behind storing grafts at cold temperatures is to reduce the metabolic rate of the cells and hopefully minimize the oxygen and energy requirements-and eliminating the by-products of that metabolic activity (free radicals).”
Going one step deeper into the subject Dr. Unger goes on to explain that hypothermic solutions act by shutting down the sodium/potassium pumps as well as the calcium channels of each cell and then further describes the two different types of holding solutions:
Intracellular-type– ie: HypoThermosol, Viaspan,Custodial – These solutions are optimized for for cold storage.
Extracellular-type– ie: Normal Saline, Lactated Ringer’s, Plasma-Lyte A- These solutions are not optimized for cold storage and notes that they can “actually cause an electrolyte imbalance and result in cells that swell when these solutions are chilled”.
Dr. Unger begins the closure of her article by accurately stating “The studies performed to date are fairly small.” And adds “It is difficult to draw any real conclusions based merely on the theoretical.” And then goes on to conclude:
“The conclusion at this point is still somewhat unclear, but the consensus is that 4-5 hours out of body, room temperature solutions are probably acceptable. After that time, there is some decrease in overall survival, and this may perhaps be mitigated by the use of storage solutions optimized for cold storage. “
Discussion by Dr. Alan Feller
Dr. Unger clearly makes the reader aware that in surgery physicians may do certain things simply because that is how they have “always been done”- but not necessarily know or understand WHY. A case of taking orthodoxy as a given.
Perhaps it is sufficient for the experienced practitioners simply to know something “works and has so for years”; however, Dr. Unger astutely points out that this is not good enough if you are going to train other physicians. More analysis and explanation as to WHY there is consensus should be available.
With respect to the topic she picked, best holding solutions, I remember this issue coming up way back during my first ISHRS meeting (the third annual meeting) in 1995. I can’t remember how many articles touched on it, but it was many. And yet here we are today still discussing it.
I think what Dr. Unger hit on here is the conflict between the “art” of hair transplantation and the “science” of hair transplantation. To my mind it has been the “art” that has propelled our industry to the height it now enjoys. The “science” has always come AFTER the fact and even been used deceptively in marketing when real world results were hard to come by (this is epidemic in current day FUE -follicular unit extraction- marketing of all types).
It may indeed be sufficient to tell a participant in an HT workshop that chilled saline should be used for all surgeries simply because that is what has been used with great success for more than twenty years. That is, if hair transplantation is viewed from the “art” perspective-which is the one I prefer.
I agree with a response made by Dr. Rose of Miami, FL about the article where he wrote:
“Just to throw a wrench into this issue. How is it that for years whether we did FUT or FUE we have all had superb results overall with chilled media?”
What an excellent observation.
But I also agree with Dr. Unger’s conclusion that room temperature media is just fine for grafts that only stay out of the body for about 5 hours.
In my practice I use chilled saline for the entire procedure. I’ve done it that way for over 23 years and it works. Simple as that. That’s good enough for me. If a company comes out with a solution that is so overtly beneficial to the grafts, then I will eagerly switch to that. But so far none have impressed me. And so I continue to use plain old saline and a chilled petri dish.
Many thanks to Dr. Robin Unger for writing the article, sharing her thoughts, and opening a discussion.
Please send comments or corrections to firstname.lastname@example.org